First Move  ·  USII Daily  · 
Around the world โ€” Wednesday morning, 08 July ยท War day 131

US-Iran Ceasefire Declared Over, Trump Threatens Further Strikes Amid Renewed Hormuz Tensions

The interim ceasefire between the US and Iran has collapsed with renewed strikes and threats, intensifying disputes over the Strait of Hormuz.

ShareWhatsAppXLinkedIn

What happened, yesterday

The story

The fragile interim ceasefire between the United States and Iran has collapsed, with President Donald Trump declaring it "over" and threatening further military action against Tehran. This comes after the US launched strikes against over 80 Iranian targets in response to Iranian attacks on three commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran swiftly retaliated with missile and drone attacks on US military sites in Kuwait and Bahrain. Tehran's Foreign Ministry accused the US of violating their memorandum of understanding by restoring oil sanctions and vowed "decisive measures," including a threat to close the Strait of Hormuz if attacked again. The fundamental disagreement over the Strait, with Iran insisting on coordination for passage and the US demanding free movement, remains a central flashpoint, stalling any progress towards a lasting agreement. The diplomatic path appears increasingly strained, with immediate de-escalation efforts now paramount to prevent broader regional conflict.

Who moved today

ActorWhat changedConsequence
USPresident Trump declared the interim ceasefire over and ordered renewed strikes against Iranian targets, hitting over 80 sites.This escalated military actions and diplomatic rhetoric, significantly increasing regional instability.
IranLaunched retaliatory strikes on US bases in Kuwait and Bahrain, and threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz if further attacked.This demonstrated Iran's resolve to respond militarily and control the vital waterway.
US Treasury DepartmentRevoked a temporary sanctions waiver that allowed Iran to sell oil on the open market.This intensified economic pressure on Iran and was seen by Tehran as a violation of the existing memorandum of understanding.
Iran's Foreign MinistryAccused the US of violating the memorandum of understanding by restoring oil sanctions and vowed "decisive action."This signaled a potential end to diplomatic progress under the current agreement.

Three ways this might unfold

A Broad Agreement on Nuclear Program and Regional De-escalation. ~10%

If both the US and Iran return to the negotiating table with a renewed commitment to the interim MOU and address core disagreements over the Strait of Hormuz and sanctions.

  • Direct US-Iran talks would resume, possibly in a new format or location.
  • Iran might agree to further nuclear inspections in exchange for sanctions relief.
  • The Strait of Hormuz would see a return to unrestricted commercial shipping.
  • Regional proxy conflicts could see a significant reduction in activity.
  • Oil prices would likely decrease as supply concerns ease.
  • International diplomatic efforts would intensify to support the agreement.
  • Trust-building measures, such as a military hotline, could be re-established.
  • The US would potentially re-evaluate its military presence in the Gulf region.

Renewed Hostilities and Direct Confrontation in the Gulf. ~70%

If the US carries out further strikes as threatened by President Trump and Iran follows through on its threat to close the Strait of Hormuz.

  • US and Iranian forces would engage in more direct military clashes.
  • The Strait of Hormuz would become a high-risk zone for international shipping, potentially leading to its closure.
  • Oil prices would surge significantly, impacting global economies.
  • Regional allies of both sides would likely be drawn further into the conflict.
  • Diplomatic channels would likely be suspended or severely strained.
  • Civilian casualties and infrastructure damage in Iran and Gulf states could increase.
  • The US might increase its military deployment to the region.
  • Cyberattacks between both nations could intensify.

Fragile Ceasefire Holds Amidst Lingering Tensions and Indirect Engagements. ~20%

If both the US and Iran pull back from further direct military action but fail to resolve underlying disputes, maintaining a state of heightened alert.

  • Indirect talks might continue, but with little tangible progress on a final deal.
  • Sporadic, localized skirmishes could occur without escalating to full-scale conflict.
  • The Strait of Hormuz would remain open but with elevated security risks and potential for disruption.
  • Sanctions on Iran would largely remain in place, hindering its economic recovery.
  • Regional proxies would continue their activities, albeit at a managed level.
  • International efforts would focus on de-escalation rather than a comprehensive peace deal.
  • Oil markets would remain volatile, reacting to every minor incident.
  • The nuclear program issue would remain unresolved, posing a long-term risk.

Around the world

CountryWhat changedDeduction
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United StatesPresident Trump declared the ceasefire with Iran over and ordered renewed strikes.This signals a direct military escalation and a hardening of diplomatic stance.
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท IranResponded with retaliatory strikes on US bases in Kuwait and Bahrain, and threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz if further attacked.This indicates a heightened military posture and a willingness to disrupt global trade.
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท TurkeyHosted the NATO summit where President Trump made his statements regarding the ceasefire.Turkey's role as a meeting point for international diplomacy is highlighted amidst the escalating conflict.
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ผ KuwaitReported sirens and Iranian retaliatory attacks on US bases within its territory.This directly impacts its security and highlights its vulnerability as a host nation for US forces.
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ญ BahrainAlso reported sirens and Iranian retaliatory attacks on US military sites.This underscores the expanded geographic scope of the conflict and the risks to Gulf allies.

Threads worth pulling

What others are saying

Carnegie Endowment (Aaron David Miller). Aaron David Miller states that "Iran is not going to give up what is now their new nuclear weapon," referring to the Strait of Hormuz, which provides "leverage and control over a choke point through which 20% of the world's daily global oil supply transits."

The Soufan Center. The Soufan Center suggests that "irrespective of whether a deal is reached to end the ongoing U.S.-Israeli war against Iran, it seems likely that Tehran will continue to cultivate a network of proxy groups... forming the cornerstone of Tehran's hybrid warfare approach."

What weโ€™ll be watching

Markets, FX, reserves: fmd-data (). News + analyst voices: grounded via Google Search at publish time.