FirstMoveFRI 31 JUL 2026
TODAYWORLDMARKETSAIAI SKILLSSPORT
First Move  ·  USII Daily  · 
Around the world β€” Friday morning, 31 July Β· War day 154

US and Israel Discuss Land Blockade on Iran; Tehran Claims Tanker Strikes Amid Diplomacy

The US and Israel explored a potential land blockade on Iran, while Tehran claimed new tanker attacks and drone strikes, even as diplomatic signals remain mixed.

ShareWhatsAppXLinkedIn

What happened, yesterday

The story

The Middle East remains a complex chessboard of escalating military actions and persistent, if often contradictory, diplomatic overtures. Today, Washington and Jerusalem discussed the potential for a land blockade on Iran, aiming to intensify economic pressure. Meanwhile, Tehran's Revolutionary Guard claimed responsibility for striking two tankers in the Strait of Hormuz and launching drone attacks on a US base in Kuwait, signaling a continued readiness for offensive moves. Adding to the regional tension, Israel conducted significant detonations near Lebanon's Beaufort Castle, asserting the destruction of Hezbollah tunnels. Amid these military developments, US President Donald Trump maintained that talks with Iran for a deal are ongoing, though Iran's Foreign Ministry denied any current negotiations. The European Union, however, offered a note of cautious optimism by welcoming a proposed Gaza peace plan. The US Treasury also indicated it is seeking Iranian assets globally, with intentions to direct the funds to the Iranian people. These events suggest a period of sustained pressure and counter-pressure, with a fragile diplomatic track attempting to navigate increasing hostilities.

Who moved today

ActorWhat changedConsequence
USThe United States discussed a potential land blockade on Iran with Israel and affirmed that nuclear talks with Iran are continuing.This signals a dual approach of economic pressure and diplomatic engagement, though the effectiveness of the latter is disputed by Iran.
IranIran's Revolutionary Guard claimed to have struck two tankers in the Strait of Hormuz and launched drone attacks on a US military base in Kuwait, while its Foreign Ministry denied ongoing nuclear negotiations.These actions represent a direct escalation of military activity and a rejection of US claims regarding diplomatic progress.
IsraelIsrael carried out powerful detonations near Beaufort Castle in southern Lebanon, stating it destroyed Hezbollah tunnels, and discussed a land blockade on Iran with the US.This indicates a widening of military operations against Iranian-backed proxies and coordination with the US on increasing economic pressure on Tehran.
European UnionEU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas welcomed a proposed Gaza peace deal.This offers a diplomatic endorsement for de-escalation efforts in the broader regional conflict.
KuwaitKuwait reported an Iranian attack on a Chinese company building that killed one worker and confirmed a drone attack on its Ahmad al-Jaber Air Base.This indicates Kuwait has become a direct target of Iranian military actions, expanding the geographic scope of the conflict.

Three ways this might unfold

A diplomatic breakthrough leads to a de-escalation agreement between the US and Iran. ~30%

If ongoing negotiations clarify Strait of Hormuz operations and lead to a broader interim ceasefire.

  • Direct military confrontations between US and Iranian forces would likely cease.
  • Regional proxies might reduce their offensive actions, particularly in the Strait of Hormuz.
  • Sanctions relief on Iranian oil could be considered, easing global energy supply concerns.
  • A framework for future talks on Iran's nuclear program would be established.
  • Tensions on the Israel-Lebanon border could see a reduction in military activity.
  • International shipping through critical waterways like the Strait of Hormuz would likely normalize.

Escalation intensifies with increased US-Israel pressure and Iranian retaliation. ~45%

If discussions of a land blockade proceed and Iran continues to target regional shipping or US assets.

  • US and Israeli military strikes against Iranian targets and proxies would likely increase in frequency and intensity.
  • Iran would likely respond with further missile and drone attacks on US bases and regional allies.
  • The conflict could draw in more regional actors, expanding its geographic scope.
  • Commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and other regional waterways would face higher risks of disruption.
  • Cyber warfare capabilities could be increasingly employed by all parties.
  • Diplomatic channels would likely become further strained or collapse entirely.
  • Humanitarian concerns in affected areas would intensify.

The current pattern of intermittent strikes and stalled diplomacy persists. ~25%

If neither side achieves a decisive military advantage nor a significant diplomatic breakthrough.

  • Sporadic military engagements would continue, maintaining a state of heightened alert across the region.
  • Diplomatic efforts would remain fragmented, with conflicting statements and limited progress.
  • Regional proxies would continue their activities, contributing to localized instability.
  • Economic pressures on Iran would remain, but without leading to a complete collapse or a major policy shift.
  • The risk of miscalculation leading to broader escalation would remain high.
  • International concern would persist, but without a unified strategy for intervention or resolution.
  • The humanitarian situation in conflict zones would continue to deteriorate gradually.

Around the world

CountryWhat changedDeduction
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ USDiscussed a potential land blockade on Iran with Israel and maintained that nuclear talks are ongoing.This indicates a strategy of combining economic pressure with persistent, albeit contested, diplomatic engagement.
πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¦ Saudi ArabiaReported to have conducted joint strikes with the US in Iraq, leading to Iranian casualties, and a civil nuclear cooperation agreement with the US was announced.This highlights its active role in regional military responses and a deepening strategic partnership with the US on nuclear energy.
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ ChinaStated that none of its citizens were affected by an Iranian attack on a Chinese company building in Kuwait.This reflects China's concern for its nationals and economic interests in the escalating regional conflict.
πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί European UnionForeign policy chief Kaja Kallas welcomed a proposed Gaza peace deal.This signals the EU's support for diplomatic solutions to de-escalate regional tensions.

Threads worth pulling

What others are saying

The Soufan Center. The June US-Iran Memorandum of Understanding did not reconcile rival strategic objectives, leading to a situation where there is 'no end to the U.S.-Iran war in sight.'

Institute for National Security Studies (Danny Citrinowicz). Iran is 'prepared to initiate offensive moves and to rely deeply on its missile array, drones and regional proxies' because its leadership views the current confrontation as a decisive battle for its regional status.

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (Aaron David Miller). There is an ongoing conversation about the current state of the Iran war and its potential future, highlighting the persistent challenges in the region.

What we’ll be watching

Markets, FX, reserves: fmd-data (). News + analyst voices: grounded via Google Search at publish time.